Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
18 results for '* topic:"Wage and Hour Litigation"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-02-16
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Cercone
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:22cv1367
Plaintiff moved to compel discovery in its a class action under the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act and the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law and court found the allegations forming the substance of plaintiff's wage and hour violations were not limited to distinct activities performed by field supervisors, defendant did not explain how the request imposed an undue burden, defendant did not provide a sufficiently detailed privilege log for those documents which it declined to produce and pre-certification discovery of the name
Publication Date: 2023-12-04
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Padilla
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2541
Plaintiffs moved for certification of their wages and hours suit as a class action. The court granted the motion where class plaintiffs sought to represent the claims of up to 400 adult strip club entertainers employed by defendant.
Publication Date: 2023-11-06
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Construction | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Ceisler
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 689 C.D. 2022
Petitioner sought review of respondent's final agency decision denying its grievance under the Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Act. The court affirmed where the historical and general renovation phases of petitioner's building rehabilitation project were intertwined for purposes of the PWA, and thus all work performed on the project was subject to the Act.
Publication Date: 2023-08-07
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pappert
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-cv-3881-GJP
Plaintiffs who owned and operated individual product distribution territories were independent contractors rather than employees of defendant food manufacturer. The court therefore granted summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiffs' putative class action claim alleging violations of Pennsylvania's Wage Payment and Collection Law.
Publication Date: 2023-07-03
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Legal Services | Retail | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Marston
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-2642-KSM
Court denied motion for sanctions against plaintiffs' counsel for opposing arbitration despite express arbitration agreement where counsel's conduct did not rise to the level of bad faith or intentional misconduct but merely represented misapprehension of the law and resulting zealous advocacy based on that misinterpretation. Defendants' motion for sanctions denied.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Patrick S. Montoya, Ervin A. Gonzalez, Ervin A. Gonzalez
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-05-29
Practice Area: Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Pellegrini
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 510 EDA 2022
Plaintiff and defendant cross-appealed trial court's order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment and granting plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment. The court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2018-10-30
Practice Area: Attorney Rates and Arrangements | Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Strassburger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-1298
Trial court did not err in awarding past due salary and liquidated damages under the WPCL to attorney who had an agreement with law firm for a salary which firm failed to pay because despite firm's allegation that attorney violated his duties of loyalty, diligence, good faith and promptness, attorney's days out of the office did not impact firm's revenue, there was no policy prohibiting working from home and firm's attempt to renegotiate the terms of plaintiff's contract belied the claim that firm believed he had constructively termin
Publication Date: 2018-08-14
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Padilla
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-0933
The court rejected defendants' argument that it was permanently divested of subject matter jurisdiction of plaintiffs' claims by operation of law where a district court denied plaintiffs' initial motion to remand because the district court's ruling on preemption was not substantive in nature and was ultimately rendered moot. The court recommended affirmance of its order granting plaintiffs' motion to reinstate.
Publication Date: 2018-07-31
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge McHugh
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-0887
Defendant corporate officers moved to dismiss plaintiffs' FLSA and state wage and hour claims for lack of personal jurisdiction because they were Maryland residents and worked for a Maryland corporation but court found that their travel to Pennsylvania to make decisions about and oversee the operations of their Pennsylvania facilities provided sufficient contacts with Pennsylvania to support jurisdiction; however court found it did not have personal jurisdiction over them for the Maryland plaintiff's claims under Maryland wage and hou
Publication Date: 2018-06-26
Practice Area: Class Actions | Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Hornak
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 18-0766
Plaintiffs' motion for class certification under rule 23 was denied because individual questions predominated and plaintiffs also failed to meet the "more searching standard" for conditional certification under 29 U.S.C. §216(b) in their complaint asserting they were improperly classified as exempt employees under the FLSA and the PMWA. Motion denied.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read