Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
15 results for '* topic:"Privacy"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-12-11
Practice Area: Privacy
Industry: Education | Non-Profit | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge McHugh
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1115
Defendant moved for dismissal of plaintiff professor's false light invasion of privacy claim based on defendant's article reposting plaintiff's tweets and alleging plaintiff was the "Antisemite of the Week" and court found the article was an expression of opinion, the republished tweets did not imply the presence of undisclosed facts about plaintiff of a defamatory nature and the first amendment required dismissal of the claim. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2023-06-19
Practice Area: Privacy
Industry: Legal Services | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Wolson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:22-cv-01520-JDW
Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff judge's false light invasion of privacy claim based on defendant's article asserting she was "QAnon-linked" and court found that reading the article in a light most favorable to plaintiff, article showed defendants did no real reporting before publishing the story and chose to view the facts in a light unfavorable to plaintiff but nothing showed they knew their description of judge was false or they recklessly disregarded the truth. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2022-11-07
Practice Area: Privacy
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Olson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 726 WDA 2021
Trial court erred in denying criminal defendant's request to seal his competency petition, where the petition included mental health treatment records that put the petition within the category of "all documents" subject to confidentiality under the Mental Health Procedures Act. Order of the trial court vacated, case remanded.
Publication Date: 2022-09-05
Practice Area: Privacy
Industry: E-Commerce | Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Ambro
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-1007
District court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants in plaintiff's Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act action over marketing service's acquiring information about appellant's website search and court found there was no direct-party exception to liability under WESCA and remanded for district court to determine where the interception occurred and to resolve disputes about website's privacy policy. Order vacated.
Publication Date: 2020-05-18
Practice Area: Privacy
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0401
Plaintiff could not sustain a negligence claim against her employer based on its alleged failure to protect her confidential medical information where her complaint failed to establish a relevant duty except by citation to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, which does not provide for a private cause of action. The court sustained in part defendants' preliminary objections.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2020-02-24
Practice Area: Criminal Law | Privacy
Industry: Health Care | State and Local Government
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Strassburger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0191
Trial court erred in ordering child advocate to review child's mental health records and disclose impeachment evidence to trial court presiding over child's alleged rapist's trial where such records were entitled to absolute privilege under the Mental health and Procedures Act. Order of the trial court reversed.
Publication Date: 2020-02-24
Practice Area: Criminal Law | Privacy
Industry: Education | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stevens
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 20-0189
The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress cell site collection data offered at his trial where he stood accused of robbery on the campus of the college he attended since defendant agreed to surrender some privacy rights to have his cell phone access the college's Wi-Fi network in exchange for use of the network. The superior court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2019-12-09
Practice Area: Criminal Law | Privacy
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Todd
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1417
Grand jury investigation target's disclosure of mental health treatment records to his employer, when treatment was obtained at the employer's behest, could not be construed as an implied or general release that would allow the grand jury to include information from the records in a public report. Order of the supervising judge reversed.
Publication Date: 2019-10-21
Practice Area: Privacy
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Beetlestone
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1243
Defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law, a new trial, or remittitur after jury found they willfully violated CHRIA in setting up the inmate lookup tool internet searchable database and court found trial court properly defined "willfulness" in the jury instructions and denied remittitur. Motions denied.
Publication Date: 2019-01-15
Practice Area: Criminal Law | Privacy
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Nichols
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0023
Commonwealth bore burden to unseal supporting documents for wiretap intercept demonstrating consent to be recorded and an affidavit of probable cause, and to disclose such documents to defendant before trial; the failure to comply with this statutory requirement warranted reversal of denial of suppression motion. Judgment of sentence vacated, case remanded.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read