Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
96 results for '* topic:"Damages"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-03-22
Practice Area: Damages
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Higgins
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2827-CV-2020
Prevailing plaintiff appealed the court's order molding her jury verdict to include delay damages. On remand from the Superior Court, the court re-calculated plaintiff's delay damages and entered its award accordingly.
Publication Date: 2024-02-02
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Energy | Recruitment and Staffing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Colville
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:19-cv-00627-RJC J.
Court declined to grant a motion for punitive damages in the form of a summary judgment motion where there were genuine issues of material fact as to defendants' culpability for a fatal motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff's motion granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2024-02-02
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Automotive | Federal Government | Retail | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Porter
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-3162
Federal government had not waived sovereign immunity for alleged personal injury or loss arising from the government's detention or forfeiture of money. Order of the district court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-01-08
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Non-Profit
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge McLaughlin
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 446 MDA 2023
Trial court correctly dismissed replevin action over domestic animal where the record conclusively showed that an animal rescue organization placed the animal with plaintiff in a foster arrangement and retained legal title to the animal. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-11-27
Practice Area: Damages
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Kennedy
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 01642
Appellants filed a motion for delay damages pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P. 283(a)(1), but the court found that the trial court erred when it denied the motion since neither of the two exceptions under subsection (b)(1) were established. The court requested that its order denying appellants' motion be vacated or reversed and that the case be remanded for further proceedings.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: George Bochetto, David P. Heim, John A. O’Connell, Robert S. Tintner
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-08-21
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Commonwealth Court, Chester County
Judge: Judge Binder
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2020-08163-TT
Defendants moved to transfer plaintiff's suit to compulsory arbitration on the ground that the amount in controversy was not greater than $50,000. The court denied defendants' motion.
Publication Date: 2023-07-31
Practice Area: Damages
Industry:
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Sullivan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1006 EDA 2022
Party who broke off engagement was not required to return engagement jewelry because party who proposed marriage was still in a valid marriage at all times during the parties' dating relationship and engagement, making the engagement void ab initio and rendering the gift an unconditional gift. Judgment of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-07-24
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Matey
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Aubre Dean, Kevin A. Meehan, Juan O. Perla, Joseph D. Pizzurro, and Allesandra D. Tyler, Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle, New York, NY for appellant.
for defendant: Jonathan M. Albano, Christopher L. Carter, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Boston, MA; Jody C. Barillare, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Wilmington, DE; James D. Nelson, David B. Salmons, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, Washington, DC; Laura D. Jones, Peter J. Keane, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, Wilmington, DE; Robert H. Poole, II, Alston & Bird, Atlanta, GA; Rajat Rana, Alexander A. Yanos, Alston & Bird, New York, NY; Joshua S. Bolian, Riley & Jacobson, Nashville, TN; Marie McManus Degnan, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; James E. Berger, DLA Piper, New York, NY; R. Craig Martin, DLA Piper, Wilmington, DE; Katherine G. Connolly, Norton Rose Fulbright, Los Angeles, CA; Matthew H. Kirtland, Norton Rose Fulbright, Washington, DC; Kevin J. Mangan, Stephanie S. Riley, Matthew P. Ward, Womble Bond Dickinson, Wilmington, DE; Ginger D. Anders, Kathleen A. Foley, Elaine J. Goldenberg, Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Sarah Weiner, Munger Tolles & Olson, Washington, DC for appellees.
Case Number: 23-1647
Despite Venezuela's opposition leader being recognized by the U.S. as the legitimate leader of the Venezuelan government, the continued exercise of extensive control by the opposition leader and his rival over Venezuela's national oil company meant the company continued as the alter ego of Venezuela and its assets remained subject to attachment to satisfy Venezuela's judgment debts.
Publication Date: 2023-04-10
Practice Area: Damages
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Dumas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1422 C.D. 2021
Trial court erred in denying city's motion for JNOV and its challenge to the derivative damage award in plaintiffs' action for trespass, private nuisance, negligence and violations of the Stormwater Management Act because derivative damages for "past, present and future loss of enjoyment of their property" as well as "annoyance and inconvenience" were not permitted. Vacated and remanded.
Publication Date: 2023-03-27
Practice Area: Damages
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Street
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 00124
The court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration following a jury verdict in her favor. Although plaintiff argued that the award was not supported by her demonstration of chronic pain, medical bills, and loss of income, the court disagreed and noted that plaintiff had every opportunity to prove up her damages claims during trial but failed to adequately present her case.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read