Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
11 results for '* judge:"Judge Wright"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-02-23
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1157 CD 2023
In this §1925(a) opinion, the court asked the Commonwealth Court to affirm its Sept. 20, 2023, order sustaining appellee's appeal of the suspension of his driver's license where there was no evidence that the state trooper, who arrived on the scene of a crash on I-95 and arrested appellee, ever saw appellee driving while under the influence of alcohol.
Publication Date: 2023-12-11
Practice Area: Judges
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1906 EDA 2023
Court recommended that appellant's appeal should be quashed as to one judge because appellant's motion to recuse the judge was granted.
Publication Date: 2023-10-23
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 704 CD 2023
Appellant, the Department of Transportation, appealed the recission of its suspension of appellee's driver's license. The court appropriately exercised its discretion as fact-finder and recommended that its decision should be affirmed.
Publication Date: 2022-06-13
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright-Padilla
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0556
The discovery order that the intervenor sought to challenge on appeal was an interlocutory order not immediately appealable because the order, which granted the defendant a protective order from subpoenas, did not dispose of the litigation. The court of common pleas recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2021-09-20
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0946
Since defendant was already barred from owning a firearm due to his conduct as a straw purchaser and his subsequent guilty plea thereto, he could not demonstrate any future injury as a result of the City of Philadelphia's enforcement of its firearms ordinance against him. The court recommended affirmance of its order denying defendant a permanent injunction.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Patrick S. Montoya, Ervin A. Gonzalez, Ervin A. Gonzalez
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-09-20
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0944
As the Zoning Board of Adjustment properly concluded, appellant failed to establish that the denial of a requested variance would result in unnecessary hardship where the subject property was located within a neighborhood which was subject to generally applied steep slope restrictions. The court of common pleas recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2021-09-06
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0897
While the plaintiff insurer secured a default judgment in this declaratory judgment action based on defendant's failure to answer, the court denied insurer's motion for summary judgment given genuine issues of material fact regarding the insurer's obligations to defend and indemnify in the underlying action given certain policy exclusions. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2021-09-06
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Construction | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0896
Appellant was not entitled to relief on appeal from an order reversing the grant of a use variance as the untimely filing of its notice of appeal deprived the appellate court of jurisdiction to entertain the merits, and the evidence did not reveal a unique hardship so as to warrant a variance. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2019-05-27
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0591
A motion for reconsideration did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal, so plaintiff's appeal was untimely and she failed to preserve any issues for appeal.
Publication Date: 2019-05-27
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Wright
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0952
The Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment did not err in granting applicant a use variance for the construction of a hotel in an industrial zone where Board's finding of unnecessary hardship was supported by the record and where objections from adjacent property owners were based solely on concerns about competition. The court recommended affirmance of its order affirming the grant of a use variance.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read