Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
42 results for '* judge:"Judge Patrick"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-02-02
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 230400157
The court's §1925(a) opinion urged affirmance of its order granting plaintiffs' petition for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the owners' association of the building where they owned a commercial unit that they were selling.
Publication Date: 2024-01-29
Practice Area: Deals and Transactions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Real Estate | Retail
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 331
Defendants appealed the court's order granting plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in its mortgage foreclosure action. Citing its original opinion and order, the court concluded that its order granting summary judgment should be affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-12-04
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Real Estate | Retail
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1951
Plaintiff lender filed a renewed petition to appoint a receiver for property offered as security on a defaulted commercial loan. The court granted the petition where defendant borrowers had improperly diverted tenants' rent payments and had mismanaged the mortgaged commercial property.
Publication Date: 2023-10-30
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 03234
Defendant borrower appealed the trial court's order denying its petition to open or strike the judgment confessed against it by plaintiff lender. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed where defendant had agreed to be bound by its note's confession of judgment provisions in a subsequent amendment to the note.
Publication Date: 2023-09-25
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 03234
Defendant borrower appealed the court's order denying its petition to open or strike the judgment confessed against it by plaintiff lender. The court requested that its order be affirmed.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Patrick S. Montoya, Ervin A. Gonzalez, Ervin A. Gonzalez
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-03-20
Practice Area: Commercial Law
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 302
A lender's notice of repossession, redemption rights and sale to a borrower who defaulted on her car loan was not misleading in violation of the Uniform Commercial Code where it did not specify the repossessed vehicle's daily storage charge or repossession fees, and where it referenced liability for "any costs incurred for vehicle repairs" even though the borrower's vehicle did not require repair. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on defendant's counterclai
Publication Date: 2023-03-20
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2543
Commercial development lenders did not commit tortious interference with contract where, with the borrowers' permission, they contacted borrowers' shopping center tenant to discuss an ongoing lease dispute but then honored the tenant's rejection of further contact, all of which occurred after the tenant had filed suit against the borrowers for breach of the lease. The trial court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2023-03-20
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Transportation
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1528
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action alleging breach of a commercial equipment lease. The court deemed the record clear that defendant had entered into and breached the agreement. The court rejected plaintiff's request for contractual attorneys' fees at a contingent fee agreement rate of 33 percent and instead awarded attorney's fees based upon the billing rate and actual hours worked by plaintiff's counsel.
Publication Date: 2023-03-13
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Non-Profit
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 03016
Injunction prohibiting appellant from appearing within five hundred feet of property owned or occupied by appellee church reflected narrowest means possible to protect church property and congregants' access while minimally infringing appellant's constitutional right to convey dissatisfaction with appellee and its leadership. The court recommended that the Superior Court affirm its injunction with the five hundred-foot distance restriction.
Publication Date: 2023-01-02
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Federal Government | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 00074
The court affirmed the judgment of the Superior Court denying a motion to enforce orders vacating receivership and requiring restoration of assets for claims arising out of a Federal Communications Commission litigation. Although appellants argued the matter should be overturned due to the court's failure to make appropriate findings of fact, the court noted that under Federal Law, the FCC was not subject to the court's jurisdiction and therefore the court was not required to make findings of fact or retain jurisdiction over the FCC's
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read