Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
15 results for '* judge:"Judge Coyle"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-02-09
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23014213
In this §1925(a) opinion, the court asked the Superior Court to affirm its discretionary order denying defendants' pretextual motion to quash a subpoena to Michael Stillwell, the sole principal of both defendants, and for a protective order because defendants failed to proffer any justification for setting aside the order enforcing the subpoena and merely claimed the court had erred or abused its discretion and Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 234.4, 3117, 4011, and 4012 support the court's discretionary decision.
Publication Date: 2024-01-15
Practice Area: Public Records
Industry: Construction | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2125
Appellants challenged the court's order denying their appeal of a final determination of the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office that had granted their document request in part pursuant to the Right-to-Know Law. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed and the appeal denied where the appeal was untimely filed and was unsupported on the merits of appellants' claims that they were provided an inauthentic document and that City acted in bad faith in handling their document request.
Publication Date: 2024-01-01
Practice Area: Law Firm Client Relationships
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | Legal Services
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1723
The court in its §1925(a) opinion urged affirmance of its order denying appellant's unsupported emergency motion for injunction requesting removal of counsel for defendant Bunul and to enjoin that law firm from representing defendant Bunul because appellant had consulted but not retained an attorney in the same law firm before Bunul's counsel joined the firm.
Publication Date: 2023-12-18
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1693
The court urged the Superior Court to deny challenges to its orders denying the motions of appellant Pennsylvania Property & Casualty Guaranty Association to strike the judgment entered on an arbitration award and judgment and for a protective order to block the deposition of PPCIGA's corporate witness in aid of execution of the same arbitration award and judgment as untimely and procedurally improper.
Publication Date: 2023-12-11
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 01031
Defendant appealed the court's denial of his petition to open a default judgment entered against him in plaintiff's residential foreclosure suit. The court concluded that its order should be affirmed and defendant's appeal should be denied.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Patrick S. Montoya, Ervin A. Gonzalez, Ervin A. Gonzalez
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-10-30
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: T0221
The court requested that its judgment dismissing a petition for distribution of proceeds of a sheriff's sale of real estate in 2014 be affirmed. It said that the Office of State Treasurer should take temporary custody of the unclaimed proceeds pursuant to the Pennsylvania Disposition of Abandoned and Unclaimed Property Act until the rightful owner submits a claim.
Publication Date: 2023-10-23
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 02367
Appellant appealed the court's order affirming a city zoning board's denial of its application for a land use permit and variances. The court concluded, without a supplemental Rule 1925(a) opinion, that the city's Zoning Board of Adjustment properly exercised its authority and expertise in refusing to approve a large development project that included residential dwellings in an exclusively industrial district.
Publication Date: 2023-10-23
Practice Area: Tax
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 00999
Appellant filed a petition seeking retroactive abatement of municipal real estate taxes that had been assessed without appeal for tax year 2017 for a multi-family dwelling structure. The court affirmed the City of Philadelphia Board of Revision of Taxes' denial of appellant's appeal, finding that appellant's delay in filing a tax abatement application was not excusable.
Publication Date: 2023-10-02
Practice Area: Public Records
Industry: Education
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 00249
Appellant challenged the court's order denying his appeal of a final determination of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records that denied his document request from appellee School District of Philadelphia under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law. The court requested that its decision be affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-07-24
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Coyle
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 01941
Appellants sought review of two orders denying their petition to open default judgment and petition to strike default judgment. The court concluded appellants' claims lacked factual and legal merit and recommended denial of their appeal.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read