Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
68 results for '* judge:"Judge Bibas"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-02-12
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1430
Defendant appealed the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possessing ammunition after being convicted of a felony.
Publication Date: 2024-01-25
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-1237
Defendant appealed the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to drug and firearms offenses.
Publication Date: 2024-01-23
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-1365
Defendant appealed the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to drug and firearms offenses.
Publication Date: 2023-12-25
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-2153
District court properly denied defendant's §2255 motion arguing 18 U.S.C. §2113(d) was not a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C. §924(c) because federal statutory text, record, and precedent showed that §2113(d) was divisible and armed bank robbery was a crime of violence under §924(c)'s elements clause. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-12-25
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stacie M. Fahsel, Renee Pietropaolo, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Pittsburgh, PA for appellant.
for defendant: Robert A. Zauzmer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Philadelphia, PA for appellee.
Case Number: 22-2153
Defendant was correctly charged with committing a crime of violence where the armed bank robbery statute was divisible as it could be committed either intentionally/knowingly or recklessly and defendant was charged with "knowingly" taking money through force and jeopardizing others' lives through the use of a deadly weapon.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Patrick S. Montoya, Ervin A. Gonzalez, Ervin A. Gonzalez
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-12-19
Practice Area: Government
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-3166
Plaintiffs appealed the district court's dismissal of their complaints against Atlantic and Camden Counties.
Publication Date: 2023-12-15
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-1055
Defendant appealed the sentence imposed following his conviction for child pornography offenses, challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.
Publication Date: 2023-12-13
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-2211
Defendant appealed from the judgment of sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possessing a gun as a convicted felon.
Publication Date: 2023-10-16
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-3431
Defendants appealed the district court's denial of their motions for sentence reductions.
Publication Date: 2023-09-11
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Energy
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Bibas
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-1613
District court erred in granting summary judgment in oil workers' FLSA action seeking compensation for time spent changing into and out of safety gear and court found the Second Circuit test the district court applied was too narrow, there were genuine factual disputes including whether changing was required by law, employer's rules or the nature of the work, whether it was industry custom to change onsite and whether it took more than a de minimis amount of time. Vacated and remanded.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read