Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
45 results for '* industry:"Chemicals and Materials"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-02-02
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Consulting
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Covey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1208-1221 C.D. 2022
Pro se claimant petitioned for review of respondent's orders affirming denial of unemployment compensation benefits. The court affirmed, concluding that claimant was ineligible for UC benefits where he was properly characterized as an independent contractor rather than an employee.
Publication Date: 2024-01-01
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Health Care | Non-Profit
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stabile
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 111 EDA 2022
Defendants were entitled to JNOV on claim for future medical expenses or noneconomic losses where plaintiffs' experts' failed to use a generally accepted scientific methodology to determine that plaintiff's chronic illness was caused by exposure to disinfectant spray manufactured/used by defendants. Orders of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-12-25
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Gallagher
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 5:21-cv-02972-JMG
Defendant moved for a new trial after a jury found it liable to plaintiff for breach of contract. The court denied the motion.
Publication Date: 2023-12-04
Practice Area: Class Actions
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-3966
Class action plaintiffs filed suit for alleged ERISA violations arising out of a corporate restructuring, seeking clarification relief or, alternatively, equitable relief to restore retirement benefits due to them before the corporate transactions. Having previously determined that the requirements of class certification had been met, and that one or more classes would be certified, the court entered its opinion setting out the exact class definitions.
Publication Date: 2023-09-25
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Chemicals and Materials
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Covey
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1468 C.D. 2022
Subsequent workers' compensation claim petition was barred by res judicata/collateral estoppel where the petition alleged disability beginning on the date of a prior work accident that employee had been adjudicated in a prior petition to have recovered from. Order of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board affirmed.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Patrick S. Montoya, Ervin A. Gonzalez, Ervin A. Gonzalez
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-08-14
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Chemicals and Materials
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Ambro
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Maureen Farrell, Adam T. Muery, Muery & Farrell, Austin, TX for appellants
for defendant: David J. Baldwin, Berger Harris, Wilmington, DE; Irving M. Geslewitz, Edward D. Shapiro, Much Law, Chicago, IL for appellees.
Case Number: 22-2181
District court erred in ordering arbitration where dispute resolution clause imposing narrow scope of review of solely factual issues during a short window of time indicated that the dispute resolution provision constituted an expert determination rather than an arbitration.
Publication Date: 2023-07-03
Practice Area: Environmental Law
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Stickman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:21-cv-00609
Court excluded categories of damages as a sanction for plaintiff's failure to identify those categories in its initial disclosures or supplements, as plaintiff did not identify those damages until serving its expert report after the close of fact discovery, which constituted prejudicial surprise to defendant. Defendant's motion to preclude damages granted.
Publication Date: 2023-06-26
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Conti
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1:17-1110
Supplier of asbestos-containing machinery was entitled to government contractor immunity where its pumps and accompanying written materials and warnings had to comply with the Navy's precise specifications and the manufacturer did not have a superior knowledge of the hazards of asbestos exposure. Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted.
Publication Date: 2023-06-20
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Consumer Products | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Greenaway
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher F. Cannataro, April M. Ferraro, John M. Seaman, Abrams & Bayliss, Wilmington, DE; Christopher M. Ryan, Shearman & Sterling, Washington, DC for appellant.
for defendant: Brandon R. Harper, John A. Sensing, Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: 22-2634
Global parent corporation did not qualify as the manufacturer of allegedly defective components which were made by a foreign subsidiary using materials produced by a third-party supplier, where the parent did not control the day-to-day manufacturing operations and merely established product standards.
Publication Date: 2023-05-29
Practice Area: Environmental Law
Industry: Chemicals and Materials | Manufacturing | State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Ceisler
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1338 C.D. 2021
Lead Certification Act did not implicitly declare lead paint a public nuisance and municipality's declaratory judgment action against manufacturers failed due to the municipality's inability to sufficiently plead proximate causation. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read