• J.J.W. v. Suppiah

    Publication Date: 2021-03-22
    Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
    Industry: Health Care
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, York County
    Judge: Judge Adams
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0209

    Even though parents did not witness the negligent administration of morphine to their minor child, they alleged enough other facts to support their claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.

  • N.C. v. R.E.

    Publication Date: 2021-02-22
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, York County
    Judge: Judge Menges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0121

    Court did not err in entering a final order following a review hearing in this custody matter. Weight given to child's testimony was proper, and no violation of father's due process rights occurred.

  • Stoneberger v. Warrington Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.

    Publication Date: 2021-02-22
    Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, York County
    Judge: Judge Menges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0120

    The zoning hearing board did not abuse its discretion in denying landowners' application for a special exception, because applicants already exceeded the permitted uses.

  • B.P. Real Estate Inv. Group, L.P. v. Soul

    Publication Date: 2021-02-22
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, York County
    Judge: Judge Strong
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 21-0119

    Plaintiff was entitled to exclusive and immediate possession of certain property bought at sheriff's sale where it produced the deed conveying the property together with a certification of recording, while defendant offered nothing to refute plaintiff's right to possession. The court granted plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings.

  • Commonwealth v. Rucker

    Publication Date: 2020-09-14
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, York County
    Judge: Judge Trebilcock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0865

    Given the state high court's guidance in Commonwealth v. Verbonitz, defendant's constitutional rights were violated when a magisterial district judge bound his criminal case over for trial based solely on the inadmissible hearsay of the arresting officer. The court dismissed the charges without prejudice.

  • York County v. Segelbaum

    Publication Date: 2020-06-08
    Practice Area: Public Records
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, York County
    Judge: Judge Renn
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0473

    A public records request was too broad and lacked any subject matter reference. The court held that the local agency was not required to comply with the request.

  • A.W. v. M.S., Jr.

    Publication Date: 2020-05-04
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, York County
    Judge: Judge Menges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 20-0443

    The trial court properly granted a motion for reconsideration of a child custody matter where mother filed her motion within 30 days of the court's decision.

  • Bank of America N.A. v. Gilson-Will

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Real Estate
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, York County
    Judge: Judge Renn
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0929

    The court denied plaintiff bank's motion to reform deeds and mortgage whereby the bank sought to remove "clouds upon the title" of the mortgaged property the bank foreclosed upon since a mortgage foreclosure action is not an equitable action or an action for declaratory judgment. The court denied plaintiff's motion to reform.

  • Herbert v. Herbert

    Publication Date: 2018-07-24
    Practice Area: Contracts
    Industry:
    Court: Courts of Common Pleas, York County
    Judge: Judge Adams
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 18-0819

    Plaintiff's complaint failed to set forth a viable claim for breach of contract where the purported oral agreement calling for defendant to transfer title of a mobile home back to plaintiff upon the death of plaintiff's wife lacked the essential element of consideration. The court sustained defendant's preliminary objections.