Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
In this case of first impression, the court held that petitioner, a document requester seeking to enforce a disclosure order issued under the Right-to-Know Law, could not enforce the order while it was being considered on appeal. The court sustained respondents preliminary objections in the nature of demurrer and dismissed the mandamus petition with prejudice.
The court granted counsels petition to withdraw because counsels no-merit letter met the technical requirements of Turner/Finley and convicted parole violators claims that the board did not have the authority to alter his judicially-imposed sentence beyond his original maximum term.
Trial court erred in holding that the compromise and release of appellants workers compensation claim barred his FMLA and common law claims because the ordinary meaning and structure of the C&R was a specific and limited release.
Access to private road was permitted where construction of other access was infeasible and therefore rendered inaccessible property that had also been opened for public hunting, such that use of the private road would serve public purposes. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Failure to object to introduction of evidence of blood draw refusal rendered issue waived for appeal even where new rule of law concerning blood draw refusals was promulgated following trial and during pendency of appeal. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Husband was not entitled to a modification of alimony pendente lite based on wifes alleged conduct in delaying the proceeding, because husband acquiesced in any such delays.
Allegation that decedent contracted fatal cancer due to exposure to radioactive source material rendered claims subject to federal jurisdiction under the Price-Anderson Act. Summary judgment affirmed.
Trial court did not err in considering sales price in fixing fair market value of foreclosed properties for deficiency judgment, where trial court also considered other factors addressed by parties appraisers, including condition of property, rental history, and below-asking price offers. Order of the trial court affirmed
The court denied a criminal defendants motion to dismiss where the offenses involved in the instant case were not logically or temporally part of the same criminal episode.
Given the U.S. Supreme Courts recent decision in Pittman v. Pa. Bd. of Probation and Parole, the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole erred in determining that it lacked discretion to award petitioner credit for time spent at liberty on parole.
1 minute read