Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
259 results for '* topic:"Contractual Disputes"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-02-07
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Education | Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Phipps
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0130
Both parties appealed district court's rulings in action alleging breach of contract, fraudulent inducement and unjust enrichment and court found district court properly granted summary judgment on plaintiff's unjust enrichment and punitive damages claims but erred in granting summary judgment to defendant on plaintiff's fraudulent inducement, breach of contract for failure to renegotiate and breach of supplemental agreement claims. Motions granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2022-01-24
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Robreno
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0072
Plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment and defendants cross-moved for summary judgment in action over LLC and sales and marketing of a knife designed by plaintiffs and court denied plaintiffs' motions and granted defendants' motions as to plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, conspiracy, aiding and abetting, money had and received but denied defendants' summary judgment motion as to plaintiffs' claim for unjust enrichment. Motions granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2022-01-24
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Chester County
Judge: Judge Tunnell
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0025
The parties' purchase agreement made clear that time was of the essence with regard to a scheduled closing date and defendant buyer assumed the risk of not receiving zoning and land development approval for its project; therefore, buyer breached the contract by failing to perform under its terms. The court entered judgment for plaintiffs.
Publication Date: 2022-01-24
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Food and Beverage
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pratter
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0069
Distributor moved to dismiss vodka company's breach of contract, unjust enrichment, fraud and trademark infringement claims after company fell behind in payments and distributor liquidated company's product and court found company sufficiently pled a breach of contract claim and dismissed the tort claims. Motion granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2022-01-24
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Biotechnology | Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Wolson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0070
Parties sought summary judgment in plaintiff's breach of contract action and court found defendant RNA was entitled to summary judgment because plaintiff's first amended complaint did not mention many of the supposed breaches of contract on which plaintiff now relied and plaintiff sought to hold RNA liable for conduct in which it did not participate. Motion granted.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-01-03
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Consulting | Software
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Beetlestone
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1510
Both parties moved to exclude expert reports in action over software ownership and court struck two reports and denied the motions as to the other reports. Granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2021-12-27
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Education | Health Care
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Wolson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1493
University moved for summary judgment in action brought by plaintiff sublicensee of company after company that had an exclusive licensing agreement with university terminated that agreement and court found plaintiff failed to produce any evidence to support its alter ego theory of liability and its third party beneficiary breach of contract claim also failed. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2021-12-13
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | Real Estate
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stabile
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1435
Appellant general partner challenged trial court's finding appellee general partner had authority to act on behalf of the partnerships after third general partner died and court found trial court erred in finding that appellee did not breach his fiduciary duties and remand was required. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Publication Date: 2021-11-15
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Kenney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1327
Plaintiff moved for default judgment in his action asserting defendant "absconded" with his funds and court dismissed all claims except for plaintiff's fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and civil conspiracy claims, granted default judgment as to those claims and award $0 in damages. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2021-11-08
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1132
The court held that defendant did not breach its contract with plaintiff subcontractor where it hired a second subcontractor to assist plaintiff in completing the work; neither party was entitled to attorneys' fees and plaintiff was entitled to prejudgment interest.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read