Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
87 results for '* court:"Courts of Common Pleas Bucks County"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-03-21
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0182
The court of common pleas lacked jurisdiction to consider defendants' request to reargue a petition to open a default judgment in this mortgage foreclosure suit as they failed to file the necessary post-hearing motions required under Pennsylvania law and improperly sought to revive certain issues in their Rule 1925(b) statement. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2022-03-21
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge McMaster
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0174
In this 1925(a) opinion, the court held husband had waived the issue of error in the denial of his motion to recuse because he failed to order a transcript of the hearing. Also, his claim of error lacked merit because husband requested the court to remain in the case to assist with settlement discussions. The court requested the appeal be quashed or denied.
Publication Date: 2022-03-21
Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
Industry: Food and Beverage | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0177
The court denied the plaintiff landlord's complaint for possession of its commercially leased property where the parties' 99-year commercial lease was more akin to a sale rather than a standard nonresidential lease and tenant had acquired an interest essentially having all the attributes of ownership in the leased property. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2022-02-21
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Yeager
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0093
The court held that defendant was entitled to nunc pro tunc relief that allowed the filing of his concise statement of errors but that his appeal of a protection from abuse order had been waived and, in the alternative, was meritless. Decision of trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2022-02-14
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0086
The court held that it did not commit reversible error when it granted attorneys' fees to defendant in a defamation action brought by her ex-husband where the plaintiff filed six versions of a defamation claim that had no basis in law because it was barred by the absolute litigation privilege.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Gary L. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-02-14
Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0088
The court held that notice was not required for subsequent violations under the Mobile Home Rights Act after the initial notice was sent out.
Publication Date: 2022-02-14
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Gibbons
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0087
The court held that actions taken by appellees to show opposition for a proposed real estate development did not constitute tortious interference with contractual relations or abuse of process. Motion to dismiss granted.
Publication Date: 2022-01-03
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Health Care
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Mellon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1424
The court reiterated its ruling in this Rule 1925(a) opinion that appellant failed to preserve her issues on appeal because she did not file a post-trial motion to remove defendant's compulsory non-suit. The court advised appellate court to quash the appeal.
Publication Date: 2022-01-03
Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge McMaster
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1427
The defendant/appellants' lengthy petition to open a confessed judgment failed to assert any argument that their landlord did not have lone authority to confess judgment against them; therefore, they waived the purported defense under Pa.R.Civ.P. 2959. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2022-01-03
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Finley
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1422
In this Rule 1925(a) opinion, the court reiterated that appellant's statement of errors regarding his standing to challenge a zoning board decision was without merit. The court requested the appeal be denied.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read