Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
87 results for '* court:"Courts of Common Pleas Bucks County"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-08-15
Practice Area: Public Utilities
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Mellon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0841
The Bucks County Water and Sewer Authority was entitled to relief on its motion for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense as it had the power to provide services within Bensalem Township and the right, under §7107 of the Municipal Claims Act, to file liens for non-payment of services. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2022-08-08
Practice Area: Attorney Compensation
Industry: Legal Services | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge McMaster
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0847
Even if plaintiff did not waive the issue of attorney fees by failing to appeal an underlying order and failing to comply with Pa.R.App.P. 1925, the company could not avoid a specific contract provision calling for reasonable fees of five percent of the total due under a lease that plaintiff relied on to confess judgment. The court recommended that plaintiff's appeal be quashed.
Publication Date: 2022-07-04
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0670
Plaintiff, a township police officer, could not avoid the collective bargaining agreement requirement that he first exhaust all administrative remedies given that his allegations of collusion and conspiracy between his employer and union were founded on baseless and unsubstantiated accusations. The court of common pleas recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2022-07-04
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge McMaster
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0669
Court denied mother's appeal from a trial court decision allowing paternal relatives to have contact with her daughter arguing that this constituted a visitation order which was not in the best interests of her daughter. The court clarified that their order allowing the contact with the paternal relatives was only a contact order arising from father's paternal rights and therefore no separate "visitation order" was issued.
Publication Date: 2022-07-04
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Corr
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0672
The court denied father's petition to modify an existing support order, which he filed less than two weeks after the parties had reached an agreement, because father failed to demonstrate through clear and convincing evidence a material and substantial change in circumstances. The court of common pleas recommended affirmance.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-06-13
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: Automotive | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Waite
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0558
Where the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation pursued two companion cases involving a mechanic and his licensed business, the court found that both matters were controlled by 75 Pa.C.S. §4724 and were, therefore, subject to the original appellate jurisdiction of the courts of common pleas. The court granted in part and denied in part petitioner's appeal.
Publication Date: 2022-04-11
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Fritsch
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0291
The court, in this Rule 1925(a) opinion, found that plaintiff/appellant's appeal should be dismissed because the order appealed from was interlocutory and not final.
Publication Date: 2022-04-11
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Advertising | Retail | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Fritsch
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0292
The court affirmed the decision and order of the zoning board that the zoning ordinance did not prohibit a billboard being placed in a township right-of-way. Appeal denied.
Publication Date: 2022-04-04
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0300
The evidence demonstrated the existence of an express grant of a right-of-way and/or driveway easement allowing plaintiff access over defendant's property and notice of that easement, which was specifically identified in a seller's disclosure statement provided to defendant. The court granted plaintiff relief.
Publication Date: 2022-03-21
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge McMaster
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0173
The record supported the court's finding that the marital portion of two assets, profitable athletic clubs, were properly valued at $2.3 million where wife's expert gave credible testimony about the increased value of those assets and the court considered the tax ramifications and expenses of sale associated with the marital portion of those assets. The court recommended affirmance.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read