Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
259 results for '* topic:"Contractual Disputes"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-10-31
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19 CV 437
Court denied defendant's motion to strike or in the alternative reopen the judgment. Although defendant argued he failed to respond to the court's service of the complaint and subsequent default judgment, he failed to articulate a viable reason for his actions or for his untimeliness in filing the motions. Therefore, the court denied the motion.
Publication Date: 2022-10-24
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Automotive | Construction | Retail
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Motto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 10474 OF 2020, C.A.
Court partially sustained preliminary objections arising out of defendant's failure to cover repairs allegedly covered under a vehicle's extended warranty. In sustaining the objections, the court found plaintiff failed to adhere to pleading requirements set forth in Pa.R.C.P. 1020. The court also applied the "gist of the action" doctrine, noting that the claims were rooted in contractual rather than tort disputes. The court did, however, find that plaintiff pled fraud with the requisite specificity and appropriately pled bad faith cla
Publication Date: 2022-10-17
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction | Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Rufe
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-455
Plaintiff subcontractor and school district moved to dismiss general contractor's counterclaim against plaintiff and third-party complaint against school district over alleged extra work plaintiff performed and court dismissed the counterclaim, stayed the breach of contract, constructive fraud and unjust enrichment claims of the third-party complaint and awarded sanctions. Motions granted in part.
Publication Date: 2022-10-10
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction | Food and Beverage
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Adams County
Judge: Judge George
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2021-SU-1047
Court granted plaintiffs' demur and preliminary objections to defendants' responsive pleadings, holding the material terms of a contract in dispute could not be converted into a fraudulent misrepresentation claim because the terms were promises for future performance rather than statements made with the intention to fraudulently induce defendants.
Publication Date: 2022-10-10
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Education
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Lindhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-01134
Court granted defendant's preliminary objections in part in a case arising out of breach of contract claims and unjust enrichment claims during the COVID-19 Pandemic. While the court agreed that plaintiffs did not sufficiently plead with specificity the provisions breached by the school, they granted plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. Furthermore, the court found plaintiffs could plead unjust enrichment because it was pled in the alternative.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Ron M. Campbell
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-09-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0988
Court denied preliminary objections to a plaintiff's tort complaint arising out of defendant city's refusal to pay plaintiff as a surviving spouse under her ex-husband's pension plan. The court denied the objections finding that while the current police pension plan provided that the benefits should be paid towards a surviving spouse, the plan that was approved by the city and implemented for more than twenty years allowed plaintiff to be paid pursuant to a Domestic Relations Order which was in effect as a result of a divorce settleme
Publication Date: 2022-09-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0989
Court denied preliminary objections to a plaintiff's tort complaint arising out of defendant city's refusal to pay plaintiff as a surviving spouse under her ex-husband's pension plan. The court denied the objections finding that while the current police pension plan provided that the benefits should be paid towards a surviving spouse, the plan that was approved by the city and implemented for more than twenty years allowed plaintiff to be paid pursuant to a Domestic Relations Order which was in effect as a result of the divorce settle
Publication Date: 2022-08-29
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pappert
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0972
Plaintiff sought summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action seeking a holding that he had lawfully sold four restaurants and court found there were two purchase and sale agreements for the restaurants, one with defendants and another with GNS Inc., and the provisions in the separate purchase and sale agreements were contradictory. Motion denied.
Publication Date: 2022-08-22
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Distribution and Wholesale | Pharmaceuticals | Retail
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Smith
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0945
District court applied the wrong legal standard in ruling on pharmacy benefits manager's motion to compel arbitration in pharmacies' mass action asserting breach of contract and other claims, and should have allowed discovery limited to the question of arbitrability. Vacated in part.
Publication Date: 2022-08-15
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure | Non-Profit | Real Estate
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Marston
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0921
Defendants moved for summary judgment in action over sale of private club and court granted summary judgment to some defendants on plaintiff's §550, §551 and adding and abetting fraud claims and denied summary judgment to one defendant on plaintiff's breach of contract claim. Motions granted in part and denied in part.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read