Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
93 results for '* court:"Courts of Common Pleas Bucks County"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-01-16
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2016-03634
The court dismissed borrower appellant's appeal in a mortgage foreclosure action on the basis that the parties had an express contract stating that New Jersey Law, rather than Pennsylvania law, would apply to determine the parties' remaining contractual obligations under a commercial loan transaction.
Publication Date: 2023-01-09
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Fritsch
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-01250
The court found for appellee on an appeal challenging service of process for a declaration of taking and declaration of blight. The court disagreed with appellant that service was not proper, finding instead that appellee had made sufficient efforts to properly serve appellant. The court further found that appellant failed to timely respond to appellee's preliminary objections and further failed to file a request for good cause to show why the filing was untimely.
Publication Date: 2022-12-12
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2020-02103-40
The court found for plaintiff landowner who sought to eject previous owners who failed to vacate the property following a foreclosure action and judgment. The court was persuaded by the fact that plaintiff established a clear chain of title and further dismissed defendants' arguments of fraud as barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel.
Publication Date: 2022-12-12
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Finley
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CP-09-CR-0000178-2022
As there was no opposition to defendant's participation in the Recidivism Risk Reduction Incentive Program, the court recommended that the case be remanded upon defendant's appeal for resentencing in accordance with the appropriate RRRI minimum upon demonstrated eligibility. The trial court sought remand for resentencing.
Publication Date: 2022-12-12
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge McHugh
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2019-05638
Defendant failed to cite any authority for, or persuade the court of, the proposition that its filing of a last-minute temporary restraining order precluded the sheriff from continuing with a scheduled sale of a foreclosed property, as the filing was clearly an attempt to once again postpone the sale. The trial court recommended affirmance.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-12-05
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Corr
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2019-02119
Court denied petition to set aside a sheriff's tax sale finding that the Tax Claim Bureau properly noticed petitioner under 75 P.S. §5860.602 by sending notice by United States registered mail, posting a notice of sale on each of the properties and publishing notice of the tax upset sale in the local newspaper.
Publication Date: 2022-12-05
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2009-07868
The court denied appellant's appeal, holding that funds the municipal employer contributed to appellant's deferred compensation plan were subject to forfeiture under the Public Employee Pension Forfeiture Act. The court pointed to precedent holding that an employee who breaches his contract forfeits his right to deferred compensation for services rendered in the past.
Publication Date: 2022-11-14
Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Bateman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: CP-09-0000248-2020
The court sentenced defendant to a term of imprisonment outside her sentencing guidelines where the child neglect at issue, involving young victims who were lucky to be alive, was described by a treating physician as the worst case of neglect he had ever seen. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2022-10-31
Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Gilman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2020-E0433
While a scrivener's error created a potential ambiguity in decedent's conditional bequest to his step-grandchildren, the record made clear that the bequest had been conditioned upon decedent still being married to the step-grandchildren's grandmother and, thus, the divorce and distribution of an equitable portion of the couple's marital assets rendered the bequest null and void. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2022-10-31
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Bateman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2016-05367
Defendant was entitled to a substantial award of attorney fees under the fee shifting provision of 42 Pa.C.S. §2503 based on dilatory, obdurate or vexatious conduct where the pro se plaintiff engaged in a lengthy campaign of filing harassing discovery requests for irrelevant information and repeatedly acting in bad faith by objecting to everything. The court recommended affirmance.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read