Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
Publication Date: 2024-02-23
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Wallace
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 473 C.D. 2020
Conservation officer's stop of fishing boat to ensure proper licensure and safety equipment served a governmental "special need" and thus did not require reasonable suspicion of a violation. Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-02-23
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Powell
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 00413
Plaintiff appealed the court's dismissal of his action against his property insurer for breach of contract and related claims. The court requested that its order be affirmed where plaintiff had voluntarily renewed his policy under its existing terms some two years after he allegedly made oral requests that his coverage be expanded to replacement cost value and that his address be corrected to reflect that he no longer lived in the multi-unit structure, which should have caused insurer to convert the policy from residential to commerci
Publication Date: 2024-02-23
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry: Health Care
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stevens
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1264 EDA 2023
Trial court erred in determining there were no contested issues of fact regarding venue and remand was required for evidence as to whether venue was proper in Philadelphia based on appellant's claim that she served appellee Abreu at her "office or usual place of business" pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 402(a)(2)(iii). Vacated and remanded.
Publication Date: 2024-02-23
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate | Transportation
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2021-06673
In a §1925(a) opinion, the court urged that defendant's appeal be dismissed and the court's decision denying a motion for post-trial relief and granting specific performance to plaintiff ETD Group on its third contract for the purchase of defendant's three lots of business property be affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-02-23
Practice Area: Education Law
Industry: Education
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Kearney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2800
Hearing officer erred in focusing on student's progress/progress monitoring in determining whether school district provided a free appropriate public education, as the proper standard was whether the district provided regular programming consistent with student's individualized education program. Plaintiffs' motion for judgment granted, defendant's cross-motion denied.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Ron M. Campbell
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-02-22
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Hardiman
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-3091
Defendant appealed his conviction for Hobbs Act robbery.
Publication Date: 2024-02-21
Practice Area: Tax
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 23-2630
Plaintiff appealed the denial of his in forma pauperis application and his requests for a guardian ad litem and transfer of venue.
Publication Date: 2024-02-16
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Linhardt
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-21,166
The court denied defendant's motion for Special Relief/Declaratory Relief.
Publication Date: 2024-02-16
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Education | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Commonwealth Court
Judge: Judge Leadbetter
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1474 C.D. 2022
Zoning Housing Board erred in denying application for special exception where ordinance did not contain specific or general criteria for approval and objectors failed to present evidence of an abnormal, substantial, and highly probable risk from the proposed use. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2024-02-16
Practice Area: Education Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Krause
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-2970
Plaintiffs appealed the district court's dismissal of their claims as moot or failing to state a claim.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read