Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
530 results for '* court:"Supreme Court"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2017-10-31
Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1621
Respondent was suspended for two years for failing to comply with CLE requirements, failing to file a Verified Statement of Compliance after his administrative suspension from the practice of law.
Publication Date: 2017-10-24
Practice Area: Attorney Work Life Balance | Insurance Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Baer
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1514
The Superior Court correctly vacated the trial courts judgment and applied the Terletsky test to decedents bad faith claim against insurer pursuant to Pa.C.S.8371 because trial court erred in demanding proof of insurers subjective motive of ill-will or self-interest. Affirmed
Publication Date: 2017-10-24
Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1602
Respondent was suspended for five years for allowing a shortfall in his IOLTA account; using funds in the account to purchase property knowing there were insufficient funds to cover the check.
Publication Date: 2017-10-24
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Aerospace | Health Care | Insurance
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Chief Justice Saylor
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1588
Under the Autism Recovery Law, the defendant insurers place-of-services exclusion in plaintiffs policy was ineffective to foreclose coverage for in-school, applied behavioral analysis treatment for plaintiffs son, who was diagnosed with an autism-spectrum disorder. The court affirmed a lower court order finding the exclusion ineffective.
Publication Date: 2017-10-17
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Procedure | Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Baer
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1554
Recusal motion untimely when filed six weeks after party admitted learning of facts that could support their motion.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2017-10-17
Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1567
Respondent was suspended for a period of three months because he violated RPC 1.1 and RPC 1.3 by failing to take action in his clients civil case to enjoin a non-judicial eviction for breach of contract.
Publication Date: 2017-10-17
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Wecht
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1557
Residential search warrant lacked probable cause where it was unsupported by tailored, individualized facts regarding the subject of the search indicating that evidence relating to the crime would be found at the residence, but such error was harmless where other evidence overwhelmingly established guilt.
Publication Date: 2017-10-17
Practice Area: Evidence | Motor Vehicle Torts | Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Todd
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1562
Superior Court properly affirmed trial courts denial of appellants motion in limine to bar the evidence of pedestrians BAC, in automobile accident that killed pedestrian, because the BAC evidence was admissible if the trial court determined that it reasonably established a pedestrians unfitness to cross the street.
Publication Date: 2017-10-17
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Education Law | Government
Industry: Education | State and Local Government
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Wecht
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1568
The Commonwealth Court erred in holding that appellants claim that the general assembly failed to provide the resources called for in the constitutions education clause and their equal protection claims based on disparities in school district funding were non-justiciable political questions.
Publication Date: 2017-10-10
Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1544
Respondent was disbarred for repeated professional misconduct in five separate matters that included failing to communicate with clients the basis or rate of his fee before or within a reasonable time.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read