Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
50 results for '* judge:"Judge Saltz"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2020-01-13
Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Industry: Consumer Products | Manufacturing
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1524
Plaintiff failed to show that he was entitled to damages for breach of contract, conspiracy, or tortious interference with contract for excluding him from the development of a prototype, so defendants were entitled to summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2020-01-13
Practice Area: Tax
Industry: Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1526
A school district's decision to appeal only tax assessments that met a certain monetary threshold was consistent with case law. The court's decision regarding valuation was supported by competent evidence.
Publication Date: 2019-11-25
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Dispute Resolution
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1343
Under a straightforward application of §42 Pa.C.S. §7319, the only proper venue for plaintiff's petitions challenging the decisions of an arbitrator was Philadelphia County, where the arbitration hearings were held. The court recommended affirmance of its order transferring this case.
Publication Date: 2019-09-23
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1067
The court denied defendants' petition to open a default judgment, because defendants did not adequately explain why they failed to timely file an answer to the complaint, and their proposed answer did not contain a meritorious defense.
Publication Date: 2019-09-09
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Health Care | Software
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-1014
Plaintiff failed to establish that defendants were liable for breach of a contract governing the sale of certain equipment and related software, as license to use software does not include a right to future upgrades unless the agreement expressly so provides. The court recommended affirmance of its order granting defendants summary judgment.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Janet K. Colaneri, Bret Weatherford
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2019-08-19
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0897
Pursuant to the superior court's recent holding in Driscoll v. Arena, the language above defendants' signatures on their mortgage was enough to render the mortgage an instrument under seal, despite the lack of a seal next to the signatures, such that this mortgage foreclosure action was subject to a 20-year statute of limitations. The court entered judgment for plaintiff.
Publication Date: 2019-08-19
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Advertising | Recruitment and Staffing
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0895
Defendants did not breach a non-solicitation provision in the parties' custom publish agreement by hiring independent contractors who had worked for plaintiff on a magazine since the non-solicitation provision applied only to the parties' "employees." The court entered judgment for defendants.
Publication Date: 2019-07-29
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Consumer Protection
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0827
Plaintiff could not maintain her wrongful initiation and continuation of civil proceedings claims brought under the Dragonetti Act where the claims pursued against her in the underlying debt collection suit could reasonably be held meritorious. The court recommended affirmance of its order granting defendants summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2019-06-03
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Manufacturing | Recruitment and Staffing
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0596
A worker qualified as a borrowed servant, so the employer was immune from liability for negligence, because the worker had already received compensation under the Workers' Compensation Act.
Publication Date: 2019-06-03
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19-0605
The plaintiff bank was not required to register as a foreign corporation doing business in Pennsylvania since, under the plain language of 15 Pa.C.S. §403(a), the activities of the bank in creating and collecting debt in Pennsylvania, however regular, systematic or extensive, did not constitute doing business. The court rendered a decision for plaintiff.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read