Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
92 results for '* court:"Courts of Common Pleas Montgomery County"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2021-08-02
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0750
The parties entered into a novation of a written contract based on their subsequent oral agreement. Because a contract existed, plaintiff was not entitled to recover on his unjust enrichment claim.
Publication Date: 2021-06-28
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Construction | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Cox
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0619
While the revival of a judgment lien on real property must be commenced within five years to avoid losing its priority relative to other judgments and mortgages, plaintiff's judgment lien could nevertheless be reinstated as a lien against remaining property by revival after five years from the date of its entry. The court overruled defendant's preliminary objections.
Publication Date: 2021-06-28
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0618
Plaintiff established at trial all the elements of a contract with defendant to provide advice and assistance in the adjustment of his claim with an insurance company in exchange for 35 percent of a recovered insurance settlement as well as defendant's breach of that contract. The court found in favor of plaintiff.
Publication Date: 2021-06-28
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0616
A school district's failure to institute a timely and thorough litigation hold resulted in the spoliation of evidence, so the court imposed a sanction of a permissive adverse inference at trial.
Publication Date: 2021-06-21
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Health Care | State and Local Government
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0612
Plaintiffs failed to show that a preliminary injunction was necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that could not be adequately compensated by damages; thus, they did demonstrate a clear right to relief and the court was not required to reach the other prerequisites for such relief set forth in state precedent. The court denied plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Janet K. Colaneri, Bret Weatherford
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-06-14
Practice Area: Fee Disputes
Industry: Advertising | Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0562
While the parties' agreement called for attorney fees of 25 percent of the total amount outstanding on the contract, such an award was unreasonable where plaintiff failed to produce evidence of the specific work performed, the difficulty of the issues presented or who performed the work on its behalf. The court awarded plaintiff partial attorney fees.
Publication Date: 2021-05-31
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0507
Injured party was a "resident" of her father's household in Pennsylvania despite the fact that she was temporarily absent from the state when the accident occurred.
Publication Date: 2021-05-10
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Saltz
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0441
Defendant was entitled to a compulsory non-suit on plaintiff's request for termination of an express easement in the absence of authority for such equitable relief based on an alleged abuse of the easement and insufficient evidence to warrant such relief. The court of common pleas recommended affirmance of verdict.
Publication Date: 2021-04-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0324
Plaintiffs carried their burden at trial of demonstrating a continuous contract with the defendant company to provide labor and materials at certain construction sites, but the evidence did not support their claim that defendants failed to make payment and the contract barred plaintiffs from relying on the theory of unjust enrichment. The court found in favor of defendants.
Publication Date: 2021-03-15
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0182
While a corporate officer or agent acting in the best interests of a corporation cannot be held individually liable for a tort, the individual defendant in this case was liable for tortious interference with contract under the "participation theory" where he interfered with his corporation's ability to perform its duties under a contract with plaintiff. The court of common pleas recommended affirmance.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read