Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
436 results for '* industry:"Financial Services and Banking"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-10-16
Practice Area: Real Estate
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Non-Profit | Real Estate
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Bowes
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 251 WDA 2022
Appellant appealed the trial court's order sustaining intervenor's preliminary objections and dismissing appellant's property conservatorship action. The court affirmed, holding that the property at issue was subject to a pending foreclosure action, and thus was not susceptible to conservatorship, where a mortgage lender renewed its efforts to obtain a sheriff's sale on the property seven months after the borrower's bankruptcy case was dismissed.
Publication Date: 2023-09-25
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Patrick
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 03234
Defendant borrower appealed the court's order denying its petition to open or strike the judgment confessed against it by plaintiff lender. The court requested that its order be affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-09-11
Practice Area: Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Padilla
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 01400
Plaintiffs, a manufactured housing lender and a private equity firm, filed suit against individuals and their trusts, alleging fraud and other wrongdoing. Some of the defendants requested a stay of the civil suit, arguing that the complaints made against them may lead to federal criminal charges. The court denied defendants' motion to stay the civil action pending resolution of an alleged federal criminal investigation.
Publication Date: 2023-09-11
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Baxter
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1:21-cv-237-SPB
The court denied motion to dismiss tort claims in Fair Debt Collection Practices Act complaint where it was not clear from the pleadings that those claims were barred by the "gist of the action" and "economic loss" doctrines. Defendants' motion to dismiss granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2023-08-28
Practice Area: Deals and Transactions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Adams County
Judge: Judge George
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2020-SU-424
A development company sued a bank alleging fraud in a real estate transaction based on undisclosed agreements the bank-seller had made with a municipality regarding water systems and water line replacement. The court considered the bank's preliminary objections to the complaint, which were overruled in part and sustained in part.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-07-31
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Perez
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2:22-cv-815-MRP
Defendants Cobb and Campbell sought summary judgment in plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, tortious interference with contracts, tortious interference with business relationships, unfair competition, civil conspiracy and unjust enrichment action and court found plaintiff's tortious interference, unfair competition, civil conspiracy and unjust enrichment claims failed as a matter of law, plaintiff's fiduciary duty claim was not barred by the gist of the action doctrine and other issues were for the jury to decide
Publication Date: 2023-07-24
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Construction | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Rendell
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew Beebe, Meluney Alleman & Spence, Lewes, DE; James M. Sullivan, Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, New York, NY for appellant.
for defendant: Kasey H. DeSantis, Neal J. Levitsky, Fox Rothschild, Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: 22-2532
Bankruptcy court correctly denied untimely motion to reopen bankruptcy case to file complaint challenging the dischargeability of debt on grounds of fraudulent transfer where the rules provided inflexible deadlines for the motion due to the limited exceptions under which bankruptcy courts could enlarge the time to file.
Publication Date: 2023-07-10
Practice Area: Banking and Finance Laws
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lehigh County
Judge: Judge Johnson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2020-C-2861
Court sustained defendants' objections to plaintiff's attempt to authenticate a credit card agreement and statement created by a third party.
Publication Date: 2023-07-03
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Bucks County
Judge: Judge Trauger
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 2017-03723
Appellant appealed the court's order denying his petition to set aside a mortgage foreclosure sheriff's sale. The court recommended that its order be affirmed.
Publication Date: 2023-06-26
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Automotive
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Schwab
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22cv1082
Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiff's claims over a motor vehicle that non-party leased, relinquished to non-party dealership which sold vehicle in a fraudulent transaction and vehicle ended up in defendant's possession and court found there was insufficient evidence in the record to dismiss plaintiff's claims for replevin, conversion and unjust enrichment on statute of limitations grounds but plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie claim for tortious interference or a claim for punitive damages. Motion granted in part and denied
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read