Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
73 results for '* industry:"Cargo and Shipping"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-09-26
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Transportation
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 19 CV 1498
The court refused to seal a proposed settlement and related filings in this wrongful death and survival action as the parties' agreement to seal was not binding on the court and defendants failed to identify any clearly defined, serious injury that they or others would suffer if the judicial records were not sealed. The court denied defendants' petition.
Publication Date: 2022-08-08
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Cargo and Shipping
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Scirica
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0892
Out-of-state claimant seeking to opt into Fair Labor Standards Act collective action must establish specific personal jurisdiction over employer with respect to the claimant's individual claim. Order of the district court affirmed.
Publication Date: 2022-08-02
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Energy
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Nygaard
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69904
District court did not err in finding contract susceptible to multiple reasonable interpretations and in relying on extrinsic evidence to interpret the contract as placing a performance obligation on one of the parties or ruling that said party breached the agreement by not performing that obligation.
Publication Date: 2022-07-18
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Middle
Judge: District Judge Conner
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0792
Expert medical testimony not required to establish causation in motor vehicle accident claim where driver's testimony would allow jury to infer that claimed injuries resulted from the collision. Defendant's motion for summary judgment denied.
Publication Date: 2022-06-27
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Transportation
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge McLaughlin
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0719
Trial court properly found the exclusivity provision in the Workers' Compensation Act barred plaintiff's negligence and wrongful death action because plaintiff belonged to a class of potential beneficiaries, non-dependent adult children of employees, that the WCA purposefully excluded from recovery. Affirmed.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-05-30
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Insurance
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge McHugh
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0602
Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment in action asserting defendant failed to pay insurance premiums and to pay contract fees for the third party administrator and court found that while defendants made various arguments, they failed to provide factual support for their assertions and provided no evidence they had paid as they asserted. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2022-05-09
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Retail
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Justice Shwartz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Adam J. Hunt (Morrison & Foerster); Joseph R. Palmore (Morrison & Foerster); Andrew M. Schwartz (Gordon & Rees)
for defendant: Kent A. Bronson (Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips & Grossman); Jared M. Placitella (Cohen Placitella & Roth); Joseph A. Osefchen and Stephen P. DeNittis (DeNittis Osefchen Prince)
Case Number: 22-1379 and 22-1380
Defendants Could Remove Case Under CAFA After Uncovering Documents in Their Possession Demonstrating Amount in Controversy When Not Sufficiently Pled in Complaint
Publication Date: 2022-04-25
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Western
Judge: District Judge Ranjan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0434
Defendant moved to decertify plaintiff's Fair Labor Standards Act collective action and rule 23 class action and court denied the motion to decertify and granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the overtime exemption status of the FLSA collective and rule 23 class and denied defendant's motion for summary judgment on the good faith defense to the imposition of double damages. Motions denied in part and granted in part.
Publication Date: 2022-02-28
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Cargo and Shipping
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Kearney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0212
Defendant moved to dismiss Indiana plaintiff's claim under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act for lack of personal jurisdiction and court found Indiana plaintiff's claims did not arise out of or relate to defendant's contacts with Pennsylvania and court declined to exercise pendent personal jurisdiction. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2021-11-22
Practice Area: Tax
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Federal Government | Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pratter
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1368
Government moved to reduce defendant's tax penalties to judgment, to provide a judicial determination that the U.S. had valid tax liens and to order the foreclosure of those liens and a judicial sale and court found government was entitled to reduce its assessments to judgment because defendant failed to raise any genuine dispute of material fact and it ordered the foreclosure of the tax liens and the sale of the property but granted a temporary postponement of the sale. Motion granted.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read