Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Get alerted any time new stories match your search criteria. Create an alert to follow a developing story, keep current on a competitor, or monitor industry news.
Thank You!
Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
How To Use Search Constraints
Categorical
judge:"Steven Andrews"
court:Florida
topic:"Civil Appeals"
practicearea:Lobbying
Boolean
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation
"Steven Andrews" OR "Roger Dalton"
Litigation NOT "Roger Dalton"
"Steven Andrews" AND Litigation NOT Florida
Combinations
(Florida OR Georgia) judge:"Steven Andrews"
((Florida AND Georgia) OR Texas) topic:"Civil Appeals"
Petitioner and parole board argued discovery issues in petitioner's challenge to the denial of his 2017, 2018 and 2019 parole applications and court found the 2022 parole denial did not make the action moot, confidentiality regulation was not a per se bar to the production of documents in a parolee's file, board did not show the criminal history record information act applied and court dismissed board's objections to interrogatories as boilerplate. Motions granted in part and dismissed in part.
Defendant moved for summary judgment in plaintiff's Fair Debt Collection Practices Act action asserting use of deceptive and misleading representations to collect a debt and court found plaintiff's assertions, that affidavits defendant relied on were made without personal knowledge, failed because declarants indicated their familiarity with the information addressed in their declarations in a manner sufficient for court to treat them as qualified witnesses. Motion granted.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Superior Court Judge:Judge Colins Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 1464 WDA 2022
Court could impose direct criminal contempt against criminal defendant who displayed emotional outburst after the reading of the verdict in defiance of the court's express instruction to maintain decorum, where such behavior in open court could undermine the court's authority. Judgment of sentence affirmed, case remanded for correction of clerical error.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01 Practice Area:Real Estate Industry: Court:Commonwealth Court Judge:Judge Leavitt Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 16 C.D. 2023
Planned Community Act entitled association to assess its legal fees incurred in attempting to enforce parking regulations upon unit owners. Order of the trial court affirmed.
City ordinance regulating firearms parts or machinery used to fabricate firearms was not preempted by the Uniform Firearms Act as parts and machinery did not constitute "firearms" under the statute. Order of the trial court affirmed.
Court overruled defendant's preliminary objections to insurance liquidator's action seeking to void money transferred by defendant under a supersedeas bond because court found that contrary to defendant's argument, insurer's liability for the judgment underlying the action was not contingent upon the order affirming the case but insurer's liability attached as soon as the district court entered its Nov. 30, 2020 court order. Preliminary objections overruled.
Publication Date: 2024-03-01 Practice Area:Criminal Law Industry: Court:Commonwealth Court Judge:Judge Covey Attorneys:For plaintiff: for defendant: Case Number: 543 M.D. 2022
Court lacked jurisdiction to consider petition seeking to invalidate mandatory life without parole sentences for 18-year-olds as violative of the Eighth Amendment and the Pennsylvania Constitution, as such a petition was only cognizable under the Post Conviction Relief Act and thus was untimely. Attorney General's preliminary objection sustained, case dismissed.
The court addressed appellant's petition for appeal from appellee's notice disqualifying his commercial driver's license for one year by finding that PennDOT was effectively punishing appellant twice for the same DUI conviction which was not permitted under 75 Pa. C.S.A §1611(a). Appeal sustained and disqualification rescinded.
Trial court reversed order transferring venue where defendants failed to identify proposed witnesses and link their evidence to the potential defense in support of their claim of hardship. Order of the trial court reversed, case remanded.