Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
259 results for '* topic:"Contractual Disputes"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2017-11-21
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Trusts and Estates
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lycoming County
Judge: Judge Butts
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1493
The plaintiff auctioneer could not recover damages based upon the cancellation of an auction for the sale of estate property where a court ordered that the auction be cancelled, not the seller who entered into the auction contract with petitioner. The court denied petitioners claim for damages on a breach of contract theory.
Publication Date: 2017-11-07
Practice Area: Business Torts | Contractual Disputes
Industry: Health Care | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Baylson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1664
Plaintiff sufficiently pled existence of contract where it alleged that defendant made assurances of potential partnership between the parties in exchange for plaintiffs assistance in acquiring assets that would be the basis of the proposed partnership. Defendants motion to dismiss granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2017-11-07
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Real Estate | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Schiller
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1655
While under the general rule, an obligee is not a claimant under a payment bond, plaintiff raised the possibility that an exception to the general ruled applied and that the defendant bond company agreed to fulfill all a contractors obligations, including payment to subcontractors. The court denied defendants motion for summary judgment.
Publication Date: 2017-11-07
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Pharmaceuticals | Retail
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia
Judge: Judge Glazer
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1628
The court ordered a judgment by confession stricken where the parties modified contract did not contain a new warrant-of-attorney provision or republish a prior one.
Publication Date: 2017-11-07
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge McInerney
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1626
Counsels failure to file a post-trial motion did not qualify for nunc pro tunc relief, because no extraordinary circumstances existed and allowing such relief prejudiced the opposing party.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2017-10-31
Practice Area: Business Torts | Contractual Disputes
Industry: Aerospace | Automotive
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Presiding Judge Motto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1584
Purchaser of a used vehicle was entitled to the return of her $2,000 deposit, less expenses sand fees actually incurred by the dealership, because the parties were mutually mistaken with regard to the availability of financing provided by a third party.
Publication Date: 2017-10-24
Practice Area: Business Torts | Contractual Disputes | Discovery
Industry: Food and Beverage | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Pratter
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1601
The court granted defendants motions for summary judgment on plaintiffs claims of conversion and fraud in plaintiffs actions based on an alleged investment agreement and the alleged misuse of the funds plaintiff provided.
Publication Date: 2017-10-17
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Procedure | Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Baer
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1554
Recusal motion untimely when filed six weeks after party admitted learning of facts that could support their motion.
Publication Date: 2017-10-10
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Corporate Entities
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Hodge
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 17-1508
The gist of the action doctrine precluded several tort claims against a contractor where the parties had a written contract for the removal of asbestos tiles and replacement of the roof, but tort claims for fraudulent inducement and negligence based on violation of a societal duty were not barred by that doctrine.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read