Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
42 results for '* judge:"Judge Rogers"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-08-15
Practice Area: Attorney Compensation
Industry: Construction | Legal Services
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0812
While a court may take judicial notice that navigating through certain legal proceedings may involve a specialized area of the law, the record herein contained insufficient evidence to support taxation of legal research at the rate invoiced; therefore, the court reduced the recoverable hourly rate sought. The court awarded garnishees attorney fees.
Publication Date: 2022-03-28
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 22-0232
By pursuing a breach of partnership contract claim at trial, plaintiff waived his post-trial claim to recover damages under the parties' novation, especially after arguing against the existence of the novation during trial.
Publication Date: 2022-01-03
Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1426
Defendant's Post Conviction Relief Act petition lacked merit where he failed to explain how trial counsel's alleged failure to follow up on questions regarding his occupation as a drug dealer presented a potential for success at trial substantially greater than the course counsel actually pursued. The court recommended affirmance.
Publication Date: 2021-11-08
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1132
The court held that defendant did not breach its contract with plaintiff subcontractor where it hired a second subcontractor to assist plaintiff in completing the work; neither party was entitled to attorneys' fees and plaintiff was entitled to prejudgment interest.
Publication Date: 2021-08-02
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0750
The parties entered into a novation of a written contract based on their subsequent oral agreement. Because a contract existed, plaintiff was not entitled to recover on his unjust enrichment claim.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Joseph S. Britton
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-06-28
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0618
Plaintiff established at trial all the elements of a contract with defendant to provide advice and assistance in the adjustment of his claim with an insurance company in exchange for 35 percent of a recovered insurance settlement as well as defendant's breach of that contract. The court found in favor of plaintiff.
Publication Date: 2021-06-14
Practice Area: Fee Disputes
Industry: Advertising | Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0562
While the parties' agreement called for attorney fees of 25 percent of the total amount outstanding on the contract, such an award was unreasonable where plaintiff failed to produce evidence of the specific work performed, the difficulty of the issues presented or who performed the work on its behalf. The court awarded plaintiff partial attorney fees.
Publication Date: 2021-05-31
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0507
Injured party was a "resident" of her father's household in Pennsylvania despite the fact that she was temporarily absent from the state when the accident occurred.
Publication Date: 2021-04-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0324
Plaintiffs carried their burden at trial of demonstrating a continuous contract with the defendant company to provide labor and materials at certain construction sites, but the evidence did not support their claim that defendants failed to make payment and the contract barred plaintiffs from relying on the theory of unjust enrichment. The court found in favor of defendants.
Publication Date: 2021-03-15
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0182
While a corporate officer or agent acting in the best interests of a corporation cannot be held individually liable for a tort, the individual defendant in this case was liable for tortious interference with contract under the "participation theory" where he interfered with his corporation's ability to perform its duties under a contract with plaintiff. The court of common pleas recommended affirmance.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read