Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
259 results for '* topic:"Contractual Disputes"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2021-11-08
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Adams County
Judge: Judge George
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1214
The court dismissed plaintiff's complaint for breach of contract in the sale of goods for failing to attach a copy of the parties' written contract or plead essential terms, failing to verify the allegations and failing to plead facts with specificity. Objections sustained.
Publication Date: 2021-11-01
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Williamson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1128
The court held that defendant was relieved from giving plaintiff any written notice of termination of pertinent contracts because either the contract was not applicable or plaintiff's material breach obviated the requirement of written termination. Complaint dismissed.
Publication Date: 2021-10-11
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Murray
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-1166
Trial court properly found against defendants in action over a promissory note because note evidenced an intent to create an instrument under seal, the statute of limitations for sealed instruments applied, the uniform obligations act applied and the note was not unenforceable for lack of consideration. Affirmed.
Publication Date: 2021-09-20
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Judge: Judge Nealon
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0948
Defendants' objections to plaintiffs' complaint were overruled where property owners stated a cognizable claim for slander of title by alleging that 1) former son-in-law maliciously filed a lis pendens notice which falsely represented that title to plaintiffs' real estate was at issue in the divorce action, 2) former son-in-law intended to cause, and did cause, pecuniary loss to plaintiffs as a result and 3) he lacked a good faith belief or probable cause to file the lis pendens notice.
Publication Date: 2021-08-30
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Transportation
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
Judge: Judge Motto
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0839
The court overruled defendant's preliminary objections, because plaintiff adequately stated a claim for breach of contract and was not required to plead causation. Additionally, plaintiff did not fail to join indispensable parties.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Jonathan H. Lomurro, Gary L. Riveles, Abbott S. Brown
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2021-08-30
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Chester County
Judge: Judge Tunnell
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0837
The court overruled defendant's preliminary objection because the plaintiff in this proceeding was not the same party that was involved in a prior action, but the court emphasized that the issue of privity could result in dismissal at a later stage of the litigation.
Publication Date: 2021-08-25
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: E-Commerce | Software
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Chagares
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: D69515
The court affirmed a judgment enforcing an arbitrator's award, because the arbitrator acted within the scope of his authority and the award contained no manifest error.
Publication Date: 2021-08-23
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: E-Commerce | Legal Services | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania - Eastern
Judge: District Judge Tucker
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0966
Defendant law firm moved to dismiss plaintiff's breach of contract, unjust enrichment and mismanagement of litigation action and court found plaintiff failed to allege a concrete contract breach but did properly allege mismanagement of litigation and legal malpractice. Motion granted in part and denied in part.
Publication Date: 2021-08-09
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Monroe County
Judge: Judge Williamson
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0752
Plaintiffs were obligated to arbitrate any claims arising from a construction contract with defendant where the contract contained a valid and enforceable arbitration clause and plaintiffs admitted that they willingly executed the contract with knowledge of that clause. The court sustained defendant's preliminary objections.
Publication Date: 2021-08-02
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Montgomery County
Judge: Judge Rogers
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 21-0750
The parties entered into a novation of a written contract based on their subsequent oral agreement. Because a contract existed, plaintiff was not entitled to recover on his unjust enrichment claim.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read