Lawyers who feel the urge to comment publicly, and perhaps passionately, about litigation opponents should be heartened by an appeals court ruling that gave an attorney wide latitude.
March 19, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Lawyers who feel the urge to comment publicly, and perhaps passionately, about litigation opponents should be heartened by an appeals court ruling that gave an attorney wide latitude.
The Appellate Division on Thursday not only found the lawyer didn’t defame an adversary’s client by talking to the press but also held the other party liable for frivolous-litigation sanctions.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
