Plaintiffs established title to a disputed portion of land between the parties' adjoining parcels through a "consentable boundary" where the evidence demonstrated that the parties and their predecessors used two fences on the disputed property as a consentable boundary for 40 years. The court entered judgment for plaintiffs.
July 14, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Boundary Dispute • Consentable Boundary • Adverse Possession • Tacking
DeMarco v. Acker, et al, PICS Case No. 17-1018 (C.P. Carbon May 16, 2017) Serfass, J. (16 pages).
Plaintiffs established title to a disputed portion of land between the parties’ adjoining parcels through a “consentable boundary” where the evidence demonstrated that the parties and their predecessors used two fences on the disputed property as a consentable boundary for 40 years. The court entered judgment for plaintiffs.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaThe current term of office for United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
