Trial court found that transfer of plaintiff's action, against energy services company for breach of contract, to Connecticut was inappropriate, because the forum selection clause in the contract named Pennsylvania. Motion to transfer denied, motion to stay granted.
May 12, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Forum Selection Clause • Putative Class Action • Transfer • “First Filed” Rule • Stay
Landau v. Viridian Energy PA LLC, PICS Case No. 17-0707 (E.D. Pa. April 3, 2017) McHugh, J. (17 pages).
Trial court found that transfer of plaintiff’s action, against energy services company for breach of contract, to Connecticut was inappropriate, because the forum selection clause in the contract named Pennsylvania. Motion to transfer denied, motion to stay granted.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
