A month after Philadelphia personal injury firm Lundy Law shot back at competitor Larry Pitt & Associates’ second amended complaint by saying the Pitt firm has “stretched the facts as far as truth will allow—and beyond,” the Pitt firm has responded that it has sufficiently alleged antitrust claims and that the case must proceed to discovery.
On Feb. 12, Lundy Law and advertising firm Titan jointly filed a motion to dismiss the Pitt firm’s second amended complaint, saying the new complaint “largely repeats the same allegations that this court already found insufficient.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]