The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments over whether the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Fund should have to apply any surplus funding from the previous year to the current year when determining contribution amounts for health care providers.
February 25, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments over whether the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error Fund should have to apply any surplus funding from the previous year to the current year when determining contribution amounts for health care providers.
The Commonwealth Court ruled in an apparent case of first impression last August that it must.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
