The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling that attorney-client privilege is a two-way street did not mean the attorney can claim the privilege, the state Superior Court has ruled.

The three-judge panel in Cohen v. Moore Becker said the 2011 Supreme Court ruling in Gillard v. AIG Insurance finding that information shared from an attorney to a client is privileged doesn’t serve to allow the attorney to refuse to share that information when the client waives the privilege.