When I started my legal career as a law clerk to a federal judge, I quickly became aware that the lawyers who appeared before federal judges in San Francisco all had reputations. Those reputations permeated the courthouse among judges, lawyers and court staff. Opinions regarding lawyers were discussed in the judges' dining room, the second-floor cafeteria, the clerk's office and all the neighborhood watering holes. As a result, when lawyers stepped into a federal courtroom, their reputations preceded them and impacted their effectiveness. The lawyers who had "good" reputations often got the benefit of a doubt; the ones with "bad" reputations faced more difficulty persuading decisionmakers that their arguments had merit.
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at email@example.com