In Part I of the analysis of computer search warrants, we discussed how the restrictive conditions imposed by the Vermont Supreme Court upon the search of a PC and an iPad in In re Application for Search Warrant , No. 2010-479 (December 14, 2012), might be constitutionally permissible. In Parts II and III, we will review those conditions.
February 19, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Editor’s note: This article is the second in a three-part series.
In Part I of the analysis of computer search warrants, we discussed how the restrictive conditions imposed by the Vermont Supreme Court upon the search of a PC and an iPad in In re Application for Search Warrant, No. 2010-479 (December 14, 2012), might be constitutionally permissible. In Parts II and III, we will review those conditions.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaThe current term of office for United States Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen in...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
