The state Superior Court has ruled that a man's use of his father's car for work and emergencies constituted "regular use," precluding him from collecting underinsured motorist benefits.
October 30, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The state Superior Court has ruled that a man’s use of his father’s car for work and emergencies constituted “regular use,” precluding him from collecting underinsured motorist benefits.
In doing so, the court ordered a grant of summary judgment in favor of his insurance company on remand.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
