Land Use and Planning
Permits Conditions Variance by Estoppel Personal Care Home
Steven J., Inc. v. Salisbury Township Zoning Hearing Board, PICS Case No. 12-1674 (C.P. Lehigh Aug. 6, 2012) McGinley, J. (18 pages).
Plaintiff was not entitled to a variance by estoppel from conditions limiting the number of residents at its personal care home and requiring installation of a sprinkler system where plaintiff could not prove that the township actively acquiesced to his failure to fulfill those conditions and where that failure posed a risk to public health and safety. Affirmed.
September 18, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Land Use and Planning
Permits Conditions Variance by Estoppel Personal Care Home
Steven J., Inc. v. Salisbury Township Zoning Hearing Board, PICS Case No. 12-1674 (C.P. Lehigh Aug. 6, 2012) McGinley, J. (18 pages).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS