The state Superior Court has ruled that oral contract extensions between landlords and their brokers are not valid under Pennsylvania's Real Estate Licensing and Registration Act, or RELRA.
July 12, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
The state Superior Court has ruled that oral contract extensions between landlords and their brokers are not valid under Pennsylvania’s Real Estate Licensing and Registration Act, or RELRA.
The defense attorney in the case said the decision will add a layer of protection for real estate owners who enter into contracts with real estate brokers.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
