“Without any instruction on this issue,” the court held, “the jury charge was misleading and inaccurate, as it instructed that any control over the manner, method or operative details of any part of the work was sufficient for liability."
February 29, 2024 at 12:12 PM
3 minute read
Litigation Reporter
The Pennsylvania Superior Court on Wednesday threw out a $6.4 million judgment entered for a welder injured in a construction accident.
The three-judge panel held that the defendant, Covanta, should be granted a new trial because the jury had been given an instruction that left out key information about the central issue of the case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Philadelphia City Hall. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
