The following are the opinions that were most frequently viewed from The Legal Intelligencer during the past week. Every full-text opinion digested in The Legal Intelligencer can be downloaded. For a complete list go to the Case Digests section.

Rush v. Erie Ins. Exch., Case No. 77 MAP 2022 (Pa. Jan. 29, 2024) Donohue, J. (38 pages). Superior Court’s conclusion that the “regular use” exclusion in an automobile insurance policy violated the language of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law was erroneous because court was bound by the decisions in Burstein v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co., 809 A.2d 204, and Williams v. GEICO Gov’t Emps. Ins. Co., 32 A.3d 1195, that the “regular use” exclusion was a permissible limitation of UIM coverage under the MVFRL. Reversed.