Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Related information

Resolving Litigation: Arbitration and Mediation After 'Concepcion'

10 minute readFebruary 23, 2024
By
Rich Lee

Rich Lee ,left, of New Era ADR and Seamus Duffy ,right, of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. Courtesy photos Rich Lee, left, of New Era ADR and Seamus Duffy, right, of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. Courtesy photos

ADR

This month, I was honored to interview Seamus Duffy, a "bet-the-company" litigator who played an early role in the matter that led to a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding arbitration. Duffy, then with Drinker, Biddle & Reath (now Faegre, Drinker, Biddle & Reath), represented AT&T Mobility in lower court proceedings that led to the high court's 2011 ruling in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion. The 5-4 court majority struck down a California law that banned arbitration agreements that would disallow class actions, holding that such laws were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925.

Duffy, now with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, explained how arbitration law has evolved from before the Concepcion decision to the world of mass arbitrations today. He also provided great insight into factors that lead cases to successful alternative dispute resolution (ADR), echoing comments from our first interviewee in this series that litigants on both sides of a case need to feel heard and trust the process.

This content has been archived. Until December 31, 2025, it is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

Starting January 1, 2026, all archived content will be exclusively available through a subscription to Law.com NewsVault.

For information about Law.com NewsVault, please email [email protected] or click here to learn more.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

Collin Williams

Arbitration emerged from a healthy skepticism of the court system, its lengthy timelines, procedural complexity, rigidity and high costs. So, why is it that, nearly a century after the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) provided arbitration with a firm legal foundation in the United States, modern arbitration often resembles litigation all over again?

July 11, 2025
Arbitration: A Faster, Cheaper Alternative—or Just a Courtroom in Disguise?
Collin Williams

A lack of diversity among its practitioners, decision-makers and the number of available platforms. These deficiencies present implications not only for fairness and legitimacy but also for the quality and accessibility of justice.

June 20, 2025
ADR: An Urgent Need for More Competition and Greater Diversity
Craig R. Tractenberg

The “partial final award” sought to be confirmed ironically was a decision by an arbitrator that the defendant Subway Franchise Systems of Canada LLC prematurely issued a notice of termination to the plaintiff Subway Development. In both instances, the parties were held to have “jumped the gun.”

June 18, 2025
Patience Needed in Franchise Dispute Resolution