The defendants contend that Bernard’s incarceration “was the result of his own vexatious and dilatory behavior.”
February 20, 2024 at 05:26 PM
4 minute read
Litigation Reporter
Two Pittsburgh judges argued that they could not be sued over the jailing of a Black attorney in connection to a discovery dispute.
Judges Philip Ignelzi and Mary McGinley of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas argued in a Feb. 16 motion to dismiss that judicial and governmental immunities shield them from allegations that they unlawfully arrested and imprisoned attorney Walter Bernard.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Alleheny County courthouse. Credit: Shutterstock
