“All of these justices also feel that it’s important to explain how they see the law. More important than simply going along to get along,” John Hare said.
February 15, 2024 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
Litigation Reporter
Pennsylvania’s justices do not shy away from disagreement, data collected by The Legal Intelligencer shows.
An analysis of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s 2023 rulings revealed that complete unanimity was rare among the justices, with concurring and/or dissenting opinions outnumbering majority opinions.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices. Courtesy photo
