The ruling opens an avenue for certain businesses to argue they do not conduct enough business in a particular county to be sued there—a defense that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s November decision in Hangey v. Husqvarna made more difficult to make.
January 16, 2024 at 04:52 PM
3 minute read
Litigation Reporter
A decision from the Pennsylvania Superior Court marked a win for business defendants in the wake of a high court ruling that dealt a blow to their ability to challenge a plaintiff’s choice of venue.
The Superior Court’s Jan. 12 opinion in Watson v. Baby Trend established that the analysis of where a company does regular business should not include sales of the company’s products made by big-box stores like Target or Walmart.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Women, Influence & Power in Law UK Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Daily Business Review honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Florida.
Seeking Estate Administration Attorney for busy boutique office. Huge upside potential and growth opportunity.NYS Bar Admission and relevan...
Description: Fox Rothschild LLP has an opening in the San Francisco, CA office for an associate in our Labor & Employment Department. Th...
Our client, a mid-sized Atlanta based litigation firm, is seeking to add an associate to their expanding ranks. Ideal candidates will have 2...
Professional Announcement
Frederick D. Miceli has joined the firm as Of Counsel
Professional Announcement
The Superior Court’s ruling addressed how a company’s sales at big box retailers like Target and Walmart should be weighed in venue analysis. Credit: MichaelVi/Adobe Stock
