The notion of a cloistered judiciary that interacts little with the public is over, thanks in large part to the democratizing effect of social media.
Whether that means large public outcries in reaction to certain decisions, real-time podcasts and Substack posts designed to directly influence court rulings, or specific interactions between judges and attorneys on Twitter, the effects are here and they’re being seen from the U.S. Supreme Court to individual state judiciaries.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]