"Their failure to provide factual background and citations to the record hinders our ability to assess their claim that the trial court abused its discretion in its selective excision of attorney time relating to billing," the court said.
July 01, 2022 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
An appeal from an attorney fee award in a consumer protection lawsuit has been rejected by the Pennsylvania Superior Court because the brief was found to be inadequate.
The appeal concerned awarded attorney fees for additional hours put in by the plaintiffs’ attorneys under the Uniform Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 601 Commonwealth Ave #1600, Harrisburg. Photo: Google
