Norfolk Southern technically had a choice to register to do business in Pennsylvania, but the consequences the company would have faced had it not done so meant its decision was not fully voluntary, the railroad's lawyers said. The justices expressed some skepticism.
September 22, 2021 at 10:46 AM
4 minute read
Litigation Reporter
In an argument before the state Supreme Court over whether an out-of-state company registered to do business in Pennsylvania can be subject to general jurisdiction, the justices seemed perplexed over the corporate defendant’s argument that Norfolk Southern Railway did not have the choice but to register to do business in the state.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
