Lemons Can Always Make Lemonade: Lessons Learned From COVID-19
Never one for change, much less a so-abrupt-forced change, the legal industry came face to face with many challenges such as managing remote workers, technology and communication infrastructure issues, employee engagement, mental health and wellbeing, and recruiting and retention, among many others.
April 27, 2021 at 12:34 PM
9 minute read
What a year it was: 2020 brought us a monumental election season and a global pandemic that put the entire world on pause. Just a month past the one year mark of the initial bang felt from the COVID-19 global pandemic, law firms are still faced with some of the same challenges as last year along with a slew of new ones. COVID-19 completely changed the world, millions of people lost their jobs, economies tanked and our industry was forced to face a long overdue reality check. Never one for change, much less a so-abrupt-forced change, the legal industry came face to face with many challenges such as managing remote workers, technology and communication infrastructure issues, employee engagement, mental health and wellbeing, and recruiting and retention, among many others. While a year can sometimes seem like a lifetime ago, it is important that we do not forget what happened when the world came to an immediate halt and shutdown orders around the country forced law firms to close their doors (and unfortunately, some of those doors closed permanently). As a followup to the article "Then & Now: Law Firm Management Challenges Pre and Post Quarantine," here are a few more areas law firms need to keep at the forefront so we can at least attempt to not allow history to repeat itself the next time a global pandemic is at our front door.
- Acceptance of the Remote Workforce.
Although some industries have made the decision to continue to offer remote work in a post-COVID workforce, the legal industry has been eager to return to in-person operations. We would have hoped that many in law firm management would have realized that "face time" is not always required to run successfully, but many firms have been chomping at the bit to get back to "the way things used to be." For an industry that already struggled with retention of younger generations of workers who always had a preference to find that elusive work/life balance, the legal industry must accept that workers of today and tomorrow are now more than ever ready to jump ship and go work for a competitor that offers the benefit of remote working. Pre-pandemic studies have shown the plethora of benefits both employers and employees receive when there is the ability to work remotely. While pretty much everyone has experienced "Zoom fatigue" over the last 13 months, a majority of workers do prefer to continue to work remotely in 2021 and beyond. Additionally, recent surveys have revealed that a good portion of employees are still downtrodden with fear from the coronavirus and may simply refuse to return to work in the office if forced to do so especially if the employee uses public transportation to commute to the office. While some firms may use that as an excuse for mass layoffs they should be wary of doing so as they may find it hard to hire new employees if they do not offer remote-working capabilities. Lastly, a remote workforce is likely to help improve your bottom line as it can equate to a reduced real estate footprint saving the firm hundreds of thousands of dollars that could go toward employee benefits and bonuses or even revamping the firm infrastructure.
Coupled with the demands from employees, the abrupt shift to an entire remote workforce was, and continues to be, a major transition for law firms as many did not previously have a work-from-home policy or the right infrastructure in place. Many firms were simply not equipped to provide their entire workforce with all the resources they would need to function efficiently from home. Our firm from its inception was modeled around the ability to allow for every employee to work from home which allowed us to adapt more easily than other firms. We stopped purchasing desktops a few years ago and only purchase laptops which came in handy when the doors were abruptly closing last year. Technology and communication infrastructure going forward should be adapted to accommodate an almost complete remote workforce—even if your firm intends to resume in-person working. Additionally, when firms shifted to remote working, many have encountered a range of security issues. Employees accessing firm data from offsite locations raised security risks and concerns. Remote work often poses a higher threat to firm data as there is almost an expectation that there will always be some employees breaking security policies while working from home. Data encryption, phishing emails, wireless connections and the potential loss or theft of devices and data all raise serious concerns. Implementing a written and thorough remote work policy helps to prevent security threats. An employee working remotely may have a bit more of a relaxed attitude toward passwords, keeping data secure or working in a location that is free from prying eyes. Even for firms who already conduct annual security awareness training, it is good practice to consistently remind employees of firm IT policies as those who plan cyberattacks and send suspicious emails containing malware have gotten more sophisticated in their tactics making it easier to dupe someone into opening an email or clicking on an attachment.
- Employee Engagement Is More Important Than Ever.
Keeping employees engaged and productive has always been a challenge for every employer. Although some individuals are capable and may even thrive in a remote and solitary working environment, others may find it quite difficult or impossible to remain focused on day-to-day operations when the general demands of home life are constantly distracting them. Parents of school age children faced homeschooling responsibilities, while others had to care for aging parents or sick relatives, which increased the amount of distractions from work obligations. Then you have the single working parents, who were forced to juggle work responsibilities while simultaneously acting as a teacher, caregiver, cook and the many other routine tasks parents find themselves responsible. But this past year has been especially bleak for those who live alone, which most likely was amplified to overwhelming levels when you add the stressors of quarantine and prolonged solitude.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhether to Choose State or Federal Court in a Case Involving a Franchise?
5 minute readKirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
5 minute readThe Intersection of Labor Law and Politics Following the Presidential Election
8 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 2FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
- 3Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 4Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 5Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.