Breaking NewsLaw.com and associated brands will be offline for scheduled maintenance Friday Feb. 26 9 PM US EST to Saturday Feb. 27 6 AM EST. We apologize for the inconvenience.

 
Commentary

The Courts Are Open, but Will They Enforce Your Noncompete Agreement?

Current operations are a bit chaotic—including some remote work—so the agreement isn’t provided prior to the first day of employment. The employee knows they will have to sign eventually, but the employer doesn’t press the issue and allows time for the new employee to review the terms.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Molly E. Meacham, Babst Calland Clements & Zomnir.

It is a familiar scene to many employers. After searching for the right individual to fill an important position, a promising candidate emerges. The new employee will have top-level access to confidential information and customers, and their offer letter anticipates that the employee will sign restrictive covenants including noncompetition and nonsolicitation agreements as a condition of employment. Current operations are a bit chaotic—including some remote work—so the agreement isn’t provided prior to the first day of employment. The employee knows they will have to sign eventually, but the employer doesn’t press the issue and allows time for the new employee to review the terms. Is this a valid and enforceable restrictive covenant agreement?  According to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s June 16, decision in Rullex v. Tel-Stream, the answer is no.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Law Firms Mentioned

The Legal Intelligencer Top Stories

 

Featured Product

Global Briefing

A weekly, curated selection of our international content from around the globe, across the business of law, in-house, regulatory, technology and more, with expert insights from our senior editors.

Learn More

Recommended Stories

COVID Backward and Forward: Restaurant, Hotel and Alcohol Sales

Robert "R.J." O’Hara |

Devastating. It is a word that is probably overused and overly dramatic. But as it applies to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alcohol sales generally, and on restaurants and hotels in particular, it is an accurate and, yes, often used description.

Practical Considerations for Protecting IP at the Employee On-Boarding Stage

Ryan O'Donnell |

Greater flexibility in remote working environments for employees has led to an increase in the revolving door of new and departing employees and greater challenges for employers to keep up with on-boarding and exiting procedures to protect corporate intellectual property rights.

Understanding and Defending Pa. Dram Shop Act Claims

Noah S. Shapiro |

Visible intoxication is not required in cases involving service to a minor. A dram shop violation is negligence per se, so if the violation is the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries the defendant licensee is liable.

More from ALM

 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Privacy Policy

About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy

Publications

Law Topics

Rankings

More

Law.com

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.