X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Pelvic Mesh Pelvic mesh. (Photo: Shutterstock.com)

In upholding a $12.85 million award in a pelvic mesh case, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has determined that a high-profile 2017 jurisdictional ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court does not represent a major shift in the way courts should analyze specific jurisdiction, despite the ruling being hailed by many in the defense bar as a “game-changer.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Max Mitchell

Max Mitchell is ALM's Pennsylvania Bureau Chief overseeing The Legal Intelligencer, Delaware Law Weekly and Delaware Business Court Insider. Follow him on Twitter @MMitchellTLI. His email is [email protected]

More from this author

 

Pennsylvania Products LiabilityBook

A comprehensive review of Pennsylvania Products Liability Law, offering analysis from the point of view of a trial attorney in this complex area providing guidance for...

Get More Information
 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.