Photo: dennizn/Shutterstock.com
Although the central questions in the cases differ slightly, both could provide guidance to attorneys on lingering questions about a person's reasonable expectation of privacy in their cellphone location data, and the level of court scrutiny that must be sought by prosecutors in order to obtain that information.
August 04, 2020 at 04:21 PM
1 minute read
Bureau Chief
What does it take for prosecutors to properly obtain warrants to track a suspect’s real-time cellphone movements?
That’s the question Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court is set to consider in two cases—captioned Commonwealth v. Pacheco and Commonwealth v. Dunkins—both of which the justices this week slated for oral arguments.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
