Photo: Shutterstock.com
The opinion clarifies that without agreements between initiating and successor firms, law firms disgruntled over fee disputes can only sue the client and not the subsequent law firm on the case.
April 08, 2020 at 03:15 PM
1 minute read
Bureau Chief
A Pennsylvania appeals court has vacated a nearly $70,000 award to a Philadelphia law firm in a dispute over how a successor firm should have disbursed the proceeds of a more than $200,000 settlement.
The opinion clarifies that without agreements between initiating and successor firms, law firms disgruntled over fee disputes can only sue the client and not the subsequent law firm on the case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
